00:24:41 sbp has joined #swhack 00:29:44 sbp has quit 00:43:28 * AaronSw returns 02:37:51 Aww, I missed Powers of 10 day. http://www.powersof10.com/p10_day/p102001.html 03:15:21 sbp has joined #swhack 03:15:47 Good idea, Aaron 03:16:00 Ah, re the www-archive? 03:16:06 yep :-) 03:16:20 I talked to my contact at Google, but she said she was too lazy to deal with it today, and the only thing she could suggest was to get more links to it. 03:16:26 Why don't you put a link on your homepage? 03:16:41 ah, now you come to mention that :-) 03:16:48 I don't think Google 03:17:01 Google's updated my homepage for a while either, has it? 03:17:42 Well, quick then you'll be able to get it into the next update. 03:17:47 Hmm... it's on v 1.16, I'm on 1.17 03:18:02 yeah, I'm just writing out the new homepage now! 03:18:08 I'll give you a sneak preview... 03:19:06 Ooh. 03:19:26 what's with the blue sidebar? 03:19:45 they're there to denote sections 03:19:51 And I'm disorieted without a big H1 at the top 03:19:56 woo! 03:20:04 me too 03:20:19 And the "* ..." stuff seems like such an abuse of markup. 03:20:51 not sure. I tried it with CSS, but then became aware that it didn't gracefully transform 03:21:21 OTOH, I've been saying that the "graceful transformation" test is an anachronism lately 03:21:43 No music stuff? 03:21:43 I just like the asterisk better than the blob 03:22:00 there is music stuff! 03:22:11 Ahh, there it is 03:22:16 :-) 03:23:03 No phenomics. 03:23:15 not *yet* 03:23:33 I may put it next to colloquial 03:24:08 there are some good little jokes developing in there 03:24:13 Yes, that'd be a good place for it. 03:24:24 like: Am I the only person in the world to whom "asinus asinum fricat" sounds like some bizarre kind of foreplay? 03:24:49 Yeah, that got me googling. 03:25:35 Semper ubi sub ubi 03:26:25 ah, should that be "who" or "whom"? 03:28:20 whom, I think 03:28:52 er... am I the object of "sounds"? 03:30:01 that very question is flawed 03:30:12 whom will do 03:30:45 In modern english who is always appropriate. ;) 03:31:16 really? 03:32:10 Yeah, whom is dead. 03:32:29 [[[ 03:32:30 "Whom" has been dying an agonizing death for decades--you'll notice there are no Whoms in Dr. Seuss's Whoville. Many people never use the word in speech at all. 03:32:31 ]]] 03:32:34 - http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/who.html 03:33:30 [[[ 03:33:31 Ending a sentence with a preposition 03:33:31 A fine example of an artificial "rule" which ignores standard usage. As Winston Churchill said, "This is the sort of English up with which I cannot put." 03:33:34 ]]] 03:33:37 - http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/nonerrors.html 03:35:31 I usually read "who" objectively, so I cannot be sure 03:36:27 Confused is the person upon whom this afflication beplagues 03:36:33 er... afflication 03:36:40 Confused is the person upon who this affliction beplagues 03:37:12 Ah, here is the xena code: http://cvs.espra.net/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/creature/ 03:37:30 the latter reads: the person who is beplagued by this afflication is confused 03:38:05 the former reads: the person who beplagued this afflication is confused 03:38:10 heh, that's not right 03:39:04 well, smeg that 03:39:10 Gotta run 03:39:25 c'ya 03:39:32 Do you have a special key sequence for that? 03:39:37 You always write it the same way, 03:39:48 never all lower case, or capitalizing the R or ending with a period 03:42:10 sbp has quit 03:42:26 Solutions don't need to make sense, they just need to work. 03:50:18 sbp has joined #swhack 03:50:40 ah, should that be "who" or "whom"? 03:50:42 whom, I think 03:50:44 nope, it's "who"! 03:50:51 I just mastered the art of reading "whom" objectively 03:50:54 says whom? 03:51:03 ;) 03:52:10 I kept reading "the person whom x y" as "the person *whom* *x* *y*" rather than "*the* *person* whom x y" 03:52:12 :-) 03:52:42 That makes no sense to me whatsoever, but good for you. :-) 03:53:16 Ooh, Zope has a featured article: Using Zope with Amaya, etc.: 03:53:16 http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Articles/ZPT3 03:54:27 actually, I think I screwed that up 03:54:36 * sbp goes back to the drawing board 03:54:40 c'ya 03:55:14 But wait, I have a Pre-Approval for $5,000 in Gold Credit! 03:55:17 :-) 03:57:41 sbp has quit 04:00:06 Maybe if we all ask very nicely... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/syndic8/message/256 04:02:39 sbp has joined #swhack 04:02:59 It turns out that "whom" is indeed correct, and that if I used "who", it would 04:03:01 mean that I sound like some bizarre kind of foreplay to a latin phrase. 04:03:07 which might actually be funnier, but still 04:03:18 whom am I kidding, eh? 04:03:20 Heheh. 04:03:32 What'd I tell you. 04:04:03 you told me that "whom" is probably correct, but to use "who" anyway. You were exactly right, but for the wrong reason 04:04:21 How do you know? 04:04:34 well, actually, it was the right reason, but not from my point of view, which is to make the thing funny 04:05:08 You've spent way too long on this and you know, nobody will notice. ;-) 04:05:25 yeah... oh well 04:05:50 Hehe, that makes it funnier. 04:05:57 :-) 04:06:23 so, am I going to use "who" or "whom"... Hmm... dunno. Perhaps I could do a random choice thing with ASP? 04:06:41 Heheh. 04:06:42 that'd be really confusing 04:07:19 anyway, I should go to bed before the Sun does its traditional risy thing 04:07:57 c'ya 04:08:04 Ah, ok. 04:10:58 sbp has quit 11:17:21 deltab has quit 11:17:41 deltab has joined #swhack 11:28:24 deltab has quit 11:28:41 deltab has joined #swhack 13:39:16 Unofficial Unsupported Ximian ISOs: http://uuxii.cofradia.org/ 13:39:21 This is what I need for Sean. 14:48:31 sbp has joined #swhack 14:53:03 sbp has quit 17:38:47 wendy has joined #swhack 17:39:33 hey there, i was looking for sbp. seems he's not here. c'est la vie. 17:54:24 wendy has quit 18:22:50 Morbus has joined #swhack 18:24:39 'lo 18:24:47 Howdy Morbus 18:38:51 hey 18:42:19 Know of any good backup programs for OS X. 18:42:41 nope. there's a disccusion on osx@perl.org concerning a perl backup program. but i don't backup. i cd-r every month. shrugs. 18:52:12 ooh, the new tabbed iface in mozilla is nice. 19:46:05 sbp has joined #swhack 19:47:56 hi sbp 19:48:38 hi there 19:50:02 my spam filters are doing good. 19:50:15 1277 blocked this weekend, only 5 fositives. 19:50:28 i think i've made up a word: fositives. i've never heard that before. 19:51:09 hey, that's cool! 19:51:10 Hehe, I was just about to say that. 19:51:12 It's a good word. 19:51:30 we must evangelize fositives! 19:52:43 Ooh, new Tom Mabe album out. 19:52:54 ? what's he like? 19:53:05 He teases telemarketers and records it. 19:53:21 Samples: http://www.tommabe.com/album.php 19:53:27 ah. 19:53:31 no sound card at work ;) 19:53:44 Aww, poor Morby. ;) 19:53:57 hehe. 19:55:17 syncassaurus is doing good. dunno if i'll make it in time though. 19:56:04 Hmm... tick, tick, tick 19:56:25 i know, 15 days :( 19:57:22 * AaronSw buys some RAM 19:57:28 i heard crucial ram was good. 19:57:39 How funny! That's where I bought it from. 19:57:45 wow! 19:57:56 that's some metaphysical joojoo right there 19:58:04 No kidding. 19:58:46 sbp has quit 20:00:24 ooh. new spolsky article. 20:00:45 Yeah, Spolsky yet again defies common wisdom! 20:00:47 :-) 20:01:10 Hmm, this "Wearing and Tearing" is quite good! 20:01:18 hehehehe. 20:01:58 Hmm, this looks like a good story: http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html 20:02:04 i fall into the not invented here syndrome an awful lot actually. 20:02:08 i want to remake everythng in my image ;) 20:02:51 Heheh. 20:03:10 Looking at the list of modules AmphetaDesk needs, I find that hard to believe. 20:03:19 ;-) 20:03:23 bwahaha. 20:03:41 well, you know, funny thing, cos I rewrote LWP::Simple, and did my own http daemon instead of using HTTP::Daemon ;) 20:04:21 LWP::Simple I had to though for compilation on Mac's. and i did my own webserver "cos i wanted to learn how"... in a future version of ampheta, we'll be ripping my code out to use http::daemon, and multithread it 20:04:54 Heheh. 20:08:13 i actually kinda agree with spolsky this time. 20:08:22 i rolled my own RSS parser instead of using xml::rss. 20:08:23 Yeah, but he hyped it more than what he said. 20:08:29 written by rael. 20:08:44 no... just hacked by him 20:08:52 it really needs to be rewritten, as he's said multiple times 20:08:56 but he hasn't had the time to do it 20:09:12 phone 20:12:24 yeah, i hacked one together using xml::simple, since that's what i was using with my config files and scriptingNews. 20:12:42 gives me more finer grain control of course. last i knew, xml::rss stripped out all html within tags 20:14:42 aaron, this looks good: http://www.mindlube.com/screenshots/slacker.html 20:15:55 Oh, that does look cool. 20:17:01 shareware too. 20:18:46 What's this mayacal? 20:19:01 Oh, a Maya Calendar? 20:19:07 i have the maya screensaver. 20:19:24 but that's a different maya ;) 20:19:32 I don't have much of a need for dates in Maya, but still it looks cool. ;) 20:19:45 hehe 20:20:22 i dunno what the shareware restriction is on slacker. haven't had a chance to dl it yet. 20:20:30 grabbed the latest mozilla for osx, and it wouldn't decompress. sigh. 20:20:55 :( 20:21:02 * AaronSw mounts Slacker 20:21:04 the new tabbed interface is nice :) 20:21:10 yeah, lemme know what the shareware thingy is. 20:21:17 or your thoughts/impression. 20:21:23 Hmm seems to be stuck 20:21:30 i like the built in date thing on slacker. that would push me over when comparing oo and it. 20:21:32 Disk Copy, that is... oh never mind 20:22:03 built-in date thing? 20:22:20 oo? 20:22:21 it looks like it allows you to say "hey, this todo item should be done by this date" 20:22:27 and then it would flag it if it's overdo. 20:22:29 Heh, nice icon. 20:22:30 omnioutliner 20:22:35 ahh 20:23:04 hmm, why do people miss out the colon in timezones? 20:23:14 I think it's a standard 20:23:26 no, I've read the standard 20:23:40 Slacker's sharewareness doesn't seem so bad... just puts up a sheet when you open the app 20:23:58 I wish it would let me define repeating tasks. 20:24:02 can i hit "enter" or do i have to mouse to the button? 20:24:06 there's a colon in the extended form 20:24:09 repeating tasks. ahhh. 20:24:10 20:24:20 i wish a lot of things would let me do repeating tasks. 20:24:28 and the date and time are in extended form, so the timezone should be too 20:24:34 To create a new task? you need the mouse 20:24:41 or type command-N 20:24:43 no, to get rid of the shareware sheet. 20:24:57 Oh... I dunno... let me quit out and comeback in 20:25:12 Hmm, now it's not there. 20:25:27 Perhaps it was just that once? 20:25:30 jabber's weirder though - it has extended-form dates and basic-form times 20:26:19 weird 20:27:24 Ooh, ligatures. 20:27:51 aaron, set your date forward 30 days 20:27:53 Cool, a "Make Sticky Note" button. 20:28:00 Ooh. that's nice! 20:29:56 Setting my date forward a month doesn't do anything. 20:33:18 huh. 20:33:28 well, i should try this out then. 20:33:40 the formats on the .todo file - proprietary? parsable? xml? 20:33:43 i'm being a pain, eh? ;) 20:34:40 heh 20:35:18 Without you, I never would have researched my purchase so much -- I just would have used it. ;) 20:36:14 "foo.todo" may be a binary file. See it anyway? 20:36:30 It's an object serialization... 20:36:53 Probably Java. 20:37:31 Heh, a completion slider... I'm 60% done. 20:37:33 ah. or realbasic ;) 20:37:41 Oh cool! It does do periodic tasks! 20:37:45 it does?! 20:37:48 oh crap, that rocks. 20:37:55 And tons of options for them! 20:38:03 hehe! yeah! i love options! 20:38:08 Heh: "often" 20:38:11 Wonder what that does. 20:38:21 heh. "brush your teeth"... "often". 20:38:40 "often (fuzzy)" actually 20:38:41 :) 20:38:51 hehe. 20:40:45 no one wants fuzzy teeth. 20:40:54 """Slacker is fully functional shareware. It can be registered for a small cost which will unlock the application and stop the very infrequent nag messages. Please visit http://www.mindlube.com/ for downloads, updates and purchase information.""" 20:41:20 ah cool. i like very infrequent. infrequent is good. 20:41:43 Ooh, and it creates a system service too. 20:42:15 this is getting better and better. 20:42:18 So you can send me todo items from IRC ;) 20:42:30 hehehe. yeah? how's that work? 20:42:56 Drag and drop text onto it or select text and go to App Menu -> Services -> Make ToDo Item 20:43:20 wow. nice. 20:47:46 Hmm, the repeated tasks don't seem to be repeating. 20:59:15 hmm, writing up my todo list in here is so depressing :( 21:09:34 ehheeh. 21:09:45 man, you should see mine. i still have stuff from a year and a half ago. 21:09:57 that's all? ;) 21:10:17 I started writing todo lists like two years ago, and they keep getting longer and longer that I need to create new ones. 21:10:22 this is my fourth todo list 21:10:50 i still have the first to complete... i'm just not interested in it anymore 21:10:59 i guess that's one way to complete tasks ;) 21:11:12 [GlobalNotice] Hi all. Services will be back up in a moment, after some splits. Please bear with us. 21:12:11 AaronSw has quit 21:12:11 Morbus has quit 21:12:11 deltab has quit 21:12:33 AaronSw has joined #swhack 21:12:33 deltab has joined #swhack 21:12:33 Morbus has joined #swhack 21:13:59 AaronSw has quit 21:14:19 Morbus has left #swhack 21:14:45 AaronSw has joined #swhack 21:14:57 * AaronSw returns 21:16:13 Whoa, that was weird. 21:17:11 AaronSw has changed the topic to: Isn't there something you should be doing right about now? 21:19:08 Sandro Hawke: "I suppose if you know what you're doing, using a chainsaw while naked is okay." 21:59:43 sbp has joined #swhack 22:00:53 Is there? Like what? 22:01:02 * AaronSw checks his new todo list 22:01:10 ah 22:01:26 You could Work on the ideal RDF API 22:01:37 or * Port Blogspace to Python 22:01:55 I could also attack my own todo list, rather than yours 22:02:03 ah, we could swap todo lists! 22:02:48 so you can write an EARL 1.0 schema and come up with a linearized canonical form 22:03:03 You don't need a schema. 22:03:08 canonical form of what? 22:03:16 don't need a schema? 22:06:02 Nah, people can just look at the examples. 22:06:28 * AaronSw adds "Finish sbp's todo list so he can do stuff from mine" to his todo list 22:06:52 lol! 22:07:04 the examples: oh, that'll be productive 22:07:23 perhaps the HTML specification should just have been a list of examples? 22:08:24 That'd be much better, IMO. 22:08:29 The DTDs suck 22:08:33 :-) 22:08:54 I agree that we need more examples, but I think RDF Schemata are useful for settling issues, and there are some experiments for which I needed the schema 22:09:23 Ah, fine. 22:10:01 and the canonical version is for the same example that RSS is canonical 22:12:59 Oh, why do you want that? 22:14:49 so that people who don't know about RDF can still look at some formalism and do it 22:15:11 Yick. 22:15:34 yeah, tell me about it 22:17:28 heh, heh: earl:name "Bob B. Bobbington" 22:18:30 lol 22:20:20 Gotta run 22:20:24 sbp has quit 22:20:25 c'ya 23:07:01 sbp has joined #swhack 23:14:58 Gotta run 23:17:58 sbp has quit 23:19:54 Woohoo! TiVo Ethernet card works. 23:24:45 rillian has joined #swhack 23:24:54 ooh, you have lurkers now? 23:25:05 Lurkers? who? 23:25:40 AaronSw has left #swhack 23:25:41 AaronSw has joined #swhack 23:25:46 well, there's two other nicks here 23:25:59 They were both here last time, I think. 23:26:03 logster, hello 23:26:23 my memory must be going 23:26:41 anyway, know what's up with the zero length files in /Library/Fonts/ ? 23:27:04 Well I can guess: all the data is in their Resource Fork 23:27:31 which ls -l won't show you 23:27:36 * rillian wonders what happens if you install those on a UFS partion 23:28:04 you are correct 23:28:16 Hmm, no fonts for UFS folks ;) 23:28:25 at least no MS ttf fonts 23:28:28 Actually, I think they have some system of splitting it into files for UFS partitions. 23:28:35 (as well as copying to other machines, etc. 23:28:36 ) 23:28:51 yeah, ok 23:29:04 I wonder if installing gnu fileutils was a really bad idea then 23:29:23 serve them right for not calling /bin/cp I guess 23:29:38 second question: the devtools working for you? 23:29:41 Yep. 23:29:50 I think there's a replacement bin/cp that groks resource forks 23:30:27 hmm. projectbuilder won't run for me 23:30:59 and I get errors like '/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib load command 6 unknown cmd field' on the cmdline 23:31:03 You got the 10.1 version, right? 23:31:17 yes. had some trouble installing it 23:31:28 Ah, right, I remember. 23:31:43 I'm afraid I'm going to have to wipe the thing and reinstall again 23:32:02 :-( 23:32:05 which's not supposed to be necessary on *nix, dammit 23:33:05 That's a really weird error. 23:34:38 Have you googled on it? 23:35:46 Perhaps it's the Two-Level Namespace thing? 23:37:48 oh, um. how does that work again? 23:38:08 Beats me, all I know is that it's a source of frustration with linking. 23:38:21 Thankfully I've been spared so far. 23:38:26 AaronSw: good idea about google; I forget that they track recent posts. don't see anything useful so far 23:38:47 Yeah, the new recent-stuff tracking is quite nice. 23:44:28 aha, macosxtips.com has a report and a workaround 23:44:38 replace the symlink with one to the debug version 23:44:57 seems like the stuff in /usr/lib is just broken in general 23:45:23 Ouch. 23:45:57 seems like they rushed things out the door a bit 23:46:14 Well, I'm still glad they released it. 23:46:59 Well, gotta run... dinnertime 23:49:57 cheers 23:50:55 aha! looks like they might have posted a new version 23:51:02 the date is later than what's on my disk 23:59:55 Morbus has joined #swhack