IRC log of swhack on 2001-09-23

Timestamps are in UTC.

00:41:55 [logster]
logster has joined #swhack
00:41:55 [carter.openprojects.net]
topic is: rdf:value a :Joke .
00:41:55 [carter.openprojects.net]
Users on #swhack: logster tav AaronSw deltab tav`
00:42:05 [AaronSw]
hmmph, where's xena
00:47:31 [GlobalMessage]
[GlobalNotice] Hello everyone. We're going to be freezing the services database at around 4AM UTC (In about three hours and 15 minutes). Services will go down for a few minutes and will come back online soon after. All changes to NickServ and ChanServ registrations from then on will be lost. Drop by in #openprojects if you have any questions.
01:04:14 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
01:05:55 [AaronSw]
hi there
01:06:00 [sbp]
Hi Aaron
01:06:06 [sbp]
Did you have a nice Saturday?
01:06:14 [AaronSw]
Yes, how about you?
01:06:18 [sbp]
I just sent a rant about XHTML 2.0: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-tech-comments/2001Sep/0024
01:06:25 [sbp]
it was alright
01:07:28 [sbp]
Keyboards should have smiley buttons! :-)
01:07:35 [AaronSw]
:-)
01:08:13 [sbp]
* sbp listens to "I'm Gonna Crawl" at very low volume, being 2:09AM
01:08:29 [AaronSw]
I'm trying to think of the word for gift economy... I thoug it was agorics, but that doesn't seem right. It's used more to describe creating a market-based system for computing resources.
01:09:10 [sbp]
how about just doing a Germanism, and having "gifteconomy"
01:09:22 [AaronSw]
:-)
01:09:39 [sbp]
or invent a word. That would be cool too
01:09:54 [AaronSw]
I distinctly remember it being ago-something... perhaps my memory is corrupted again. :-(
01:10:15 [AaronSw]
* AaronSw apologizes in advance for having led tav astray...
01:10:47 [sbp]
agouti?
01:10:56 [sbp]
a small rabbit like creature from South America
01:11:00 [sbp]
:-)
01:11:12 [AaronSw]
no... don't think that was it ;-)
01:11:24 [sbp]
There aren't many words that start with "ago"
01:11:36 [sbp]
ago-go
01:11:37 [AaronSw]
it's in my meail somewhere, but I haven't coppied over the archives far enough to get at it. :-(
01:11:46 [sbp]
blargh
01:11:55 [AaronSw]
it had a domain name... so netcraft should find it
01:11:55 [sbp]
tried the Web?
01:12:07 [AaronSw]
yeah...
01:15:21 [AaronSw]
hmm
01:16:11 [sbp]
Pfffff... how can "deeley" not be in the dictionary? http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=deeley
01:16:57 [AaronSw]
heh
01:17:32 [sbp]
it's outrageous
01:18:12 [AaronSw]
Ooh, a new Sean-coinage:
01:18:13 [AaronSw]
"that are erndered visually is their aspect ratios"
01:18:36 [sbp]
Hmm... only one page on Google has both the words "deeley" and "doohickey" on it
01:18:46 [sbp]
yeah, I messed that up a bit
01:18:56 [sbp]
I meant "rendered" or something
01:19:00 [AaronSw]
google: Yours?
01:19:11 [sbp]
how *did* you guess? :-)
01:19:17 [sbp]
http://www.google.com/search?q=deeley+doohickey&hl=en
01:19:23 [AaronSw]
Well, now we have two ;-)
01:19:34 [sbp]
two what?
01:19:41 [AaronSw]
two pages with both those words
01:19:50 [sbp]
but not two pages on Google!
01:19:59 [AaronSw]
give it some time!
01:20:05 [sbp]
O.K.!
01:20:14 [sbp]
He he he
01:20:31 [AaronSw]
Google probably updates the archives of this channel pretty regularly...
01:20:51 [sbp]
Are they in there at all?
01:22:20 [AaronSw]
Hmm, you're right! They aren't.
01:22:23 [AaronSw]
We must remedy this...
01:22:24 [sbp]
thought not
01:22:55 [AaronSw]
I'll point to it from my website, that'll give them authority.
01:23:51 [sbp]
Why don't you just enter it in their Add URL form deeley?
01:23:58 [AaronSw]
I'll do that too.
01:25:38 [sbp]
where's googler gone?
01:25:54 [AaronSw]
I figured xena replaced it.
01:25:58 [AaronSw]
But now xena's gone... :-(
01:26:06 [AaronSw]
... again
01:27:16 [sbp]
Gmgpmgpmgpmh
01:28:20 [sbp]
acronyms: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=RDF+N3+URI+XML+XHTML+SW+DAML+CSS+CWM
01:29:27 [sbp]
wow: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Semantic+Web%22&hl=en&start=10&sa=N
01:29:44 [sbp]
swintro has gradually risen to the top of the second page for "Semantic Web"
01:30:28 [AaronSw]
wow
01:30:45 [sbp]
It'll be above the SW homepage soon! Maybe not
01:31:59 [sbp]
Ooh, I redesigned SBP SWAD! I have to upload it...
01:32:08 [AaronSw]
swintro: Perhaps it's just the after effects of dave pointing to it?
01:33:05 [sbp]
I don't think Google
01:33:10 [sbp]
's picked up on that yet
01:33:21 [sbp]
It says that no page even links to swintro yet
01:33:23 [sbp]
ta da: http://infomesh.net/2001/05/sw/
01:33:33 [AaronSw]
the links to thing is weird
01:34:30 [AaronSw]
What's that weird thing on the new SBP SWAD?
01:34:51 [sbp]
what weird thing?
01:34:59 [AaronSw]
the thing on the top
01:35:19 [sbp]
Um... it's a torn page: a scrap of paper
01:35:32 [sbp]
is it really that non-obvious? Eek
01:35:52 [AaronSw]
It looks like evil setting in over the page..
01:36:27 [sbp]
Erm... is your screen on a weird setting or something?
01:38:18 [AaronSw]
No... I see what you mean -- it just looks weird.
01:38:39 [sbp]
Gmbrggmbmgm; I've got rid of it, Mr. Aaron "rip the fun out of anything" Swartz :-)
01:38:53 [sbp]
Ugh, and now the stylesheet doesn't work
01:39:03 [sbp]
* sbp mumbles som'ore
01:39:26 [AaronSw]
heh
01:39:36 [sbp]
There, that's better
01:41:09 [sbp]
* sbp does more barely audiable mumbling
01:42:19 [sbp]
Note that I put the befunge93 SW program on there
01:42:29 [sbp]
[[[
01:42:29 [sbp]
Semantic Web: Befunge93 Programs
01:42:30 [sbp]
I wrote what may be the shortest and most obfuscated Semantic Web program to date:-
01:42:30 [sbp]
0v_^#-3:+1,,"> "< -
01:42:30 [sbp]
>"<" >,~:25#$*^
01:42:30 [sbp]
>".",@^ _^#<
01:42:31 [sbp]
It takes in three URIs from user input, and outputs an NTriple.
01:42:33 [sbp]
]]]
01:42:59 [AaronSw]
heh
01:45:00 [sbp]
* sbp thinks of a way in which he might make it shorter
01:45:07 [AaronSw]
hmm, the CSS hasn't updated...
01:46:42 [sbp]
Nah, I was wrong
01:46:46 [sbp]
hit refresh
01:46:51 [sbp]
46... hmm
01:47:06 [sbp]
LCF's are 2 and 23. Crap
01:47:18 [sbp]
59*1+
01:47:41 [sbp]
heh, two characters longer
01:47:48 [AaronSw]
I still see:
01:47:48 [AaronSw]
background: url(back.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat;
01:48:01 [sbp]
yeah, but I removed back.gif
01:48:13 [AaronSw]
well, pfff that's no good
01:48:33 [AaronSw]
Come on sbp, 404s!
01:48:36 [sbp]
* sbp comments that bit out too
01:48:53 [sbp]
and I've restored back.gif
01:48:55 [AaronSw]
That's better
01:50:40 [sbp]
crap, I thought I had another way to make it smaller then...
01:51:30 [sbp]
ooh! I may have it
01:52:37 [sbp]
er no... that didn't make it any shorter whatsoever. Duh
01:54:20 [sbp]
Befunge is so cool...
01:57:01 [sbp]
ah... I could turn it upside down
02:00:27 [sbp]
that didn't help much
02:00:32 [sbp]
0v >".",@v _v#<
02:00:32 [sbp]
>"<" >,~:25#$*v
02:00:32 [sbp]
^_v#-3:+1,,"> "< -
02:02:10 [sbp]
aha!
02:02:47 [sbp]
v_^#-3:+1,,"> "< -
02:02:47 [sbp]
>"<" >,~:25#$*^
02:02:47 [sbp]
>".",@^ _^#<
02:03:13 [sbp]
you don't need to put 0 in the stack, because it's there implicitly anyway. A quirk of Befunge
02:04:06 [AaronSw]
weird
02:05:09 [sbp]
not it's just 18x3
02:06:20 [sbp]
Ooh! I can duplicate the comma
02:06:37 [sbp]
No I can't...
02:11:31 [sbp]
the ^, $, and < need to align, so I don't think it can get any shorter
02:11:34 [sbp]
Gotta run
02:11:41 [AaronSw]
bye
02:14:35 [sbp]
sbp has quit
02:25:19 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
02:25:37 [sbp]
I made it 15x3!
02:25:39 [sbp]
Hooray!
02:25:41 [sbp]
>"<" ,>~:25#$*v
02:25:43 [sbp]
|-3:+1,,"> "< -
02:25:45 [sbp]
>".",@v, _v#<
02:25:59 [deltab]
neat
02:26:06 [sbp]
thank you :-)
02:26:16 [deltab]
in multiple senses of the word :-)
02:26:26 [sbp]
:-)
02:26:34 [sbp]
I figured that I could use a vertical if, as long as I turned the program upside down
02:26:51 [deltab]
hehe
02:27:05 [sbp]
then I realised that it's a torus, and that instead of directing the pointer down and then along, I could just put that line at the top
02:27:21 [sbp]
and then I realised that if I duplicated a comma, I'd save another space
02:27:29 [sbp]
so that's three spaces I saved
02:30:57 [sbp]
it's a shame that there isn't a character that lets you pop two values as alpha
02:31:06 [sbp]
then I could compact the double comma
02:37:13 [AaronSw]
Hmm, it seems Mark Bernstein agrees with me about Bush's "war"...:
02:37:22 [AaronSw]
"""I don't agree with most people. But I'm part of a small minority, a fringe, like the folks who thought Nixon wasn't a crook.
02:37:23 [AaronSw]
People are talking about wild things. Completely reconstructing the Middle East. Occupation. Nuclear weapons. """
02:42:53 [sbp]
* sbp wonders if anyone has actually tried to draw a befunge93 program on a donut
02:44:49 [sbp]
Hmm...
02:46:15 [sbp]
>"<" ,>~:25#$*v
02:46:15 [sbp]
|-3:+1,,"> "< -
02:46:15 [sbp]
>".",@^ _v#<
02:46:17 [sbp]
works too
02:46:30 [sbp]
one less comma, but it's no smaller
02:47:07 [AaronSw]
this is like an obsession...
02:47:40 [AaronSw]
OK, I'm going to play Escape from Monkey Island -- c'yas later
02:47:44 [sbp]
try it: you'll find out just how frustrating it is to have spaces in a b93 program!
02:47:46 [sbp]
c'ya
02:49:57 [sbp]
Gotta run
02:52:57 [sbp]
sbp has quit
03:47:53 [AaronSw]
fwump
03:54:10 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
03:54:25 [AaronSw]
hullo
03:58:31 [sbp]
HI
03:58:35 [sbp]
Hi even
03:58:37 [sbp]
Gotta run
03:59:03 [AaronSw]
That was quick.
04:01:37 [sbp]
sbp has quit
04:49:11 [lilo]
[GlobalNotice] Hi all. Services will be returning in a moment, accompanied by a fair number of splits. Please bear with us. Thanks for your patience.
04:49:47 [AaronSw]
AaronSw has quit
04:49:47 [tav`]
tav` has quit
04:49:47 [deltab]
deltab has quit
04:49:47 [tav]
tav has quit
04:50:07 [deltab]
deltab has joined #swhack
04:50:07 [tav`]
tav` has joined #swhack
04:50:07 [AaronSw]
AaronSw has joined #swhack
04:50:07 [tav]
tav has joined #swhack
04:59:08 [AaronSw]
AaronSw has changed the topic to: Everything we do is art.
13:17:56 [AaronSw]
AaronSw has changed the topic to: I have an urge not merely to be an architect but a builder too. | Everything we do is art.
13:18:19 [AaronSw]
AaronSw has changed the topic to: At no time is freedom of speech more precious than when a man hits his thumb with a hammer. - Todat's fortune message | I have an urge not merely to be an architect but a builder too. - tav | Everything we do is art. - some native tribe
15:15:23 [Morbus]
Morbus has joined #swhack
15:15:33 [Morbus]
Morbus has quit
15:16:00 [AaronSw]
* AaronSw hopes to go to New York soon.
15:16:05 [AaronSw]
cf. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/21/opinion/21FRI2.html
15:16:22 [Morbus]
Morbus has joined #swhack
15:17:44 [AaronSw]
hi
15:17:51 [Morbus]
hey there. won't be staying long.
15:21:08 [Morbus]
have you gotten your three o'reilly books? only ... a week left, i think.
15:23:04 [tav]
till ?
15:23:20 [Morbus]
end of september.
15:23:22 [AaronSw]
Huh?
15:23:27 [Morbus]
buy 2, get 1 free
15:23:57 [AaronSw]
oh... i can't think of any o'reilly books i really want
15:25:19 [Morbus]
alright, well, i have to go now. ciao all...
15:25:32 [Morbus]
Morbus has quit
15:25:58 [tav]
heh
15:55:19 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
15:57:05 [sbp]
Ping
15:57:07 [AaronSw]
pong
15:57:52 [AaronSw]
wassup?
15:58:49 [sbp]
I just wanted to know if you'd gone stark bollock raving mad or not
15:59:38 [sbp]
[[[
15:59:38 [sbp]
I believe that these "URI-views", or
15:59:38 [sbp]
whatever we wish to call them, should be removed from the RDF
15:59:38 [sbp]
spec.
15:59:40 [sbp]
]]]
15:59:56 [sbp]
tav, what the fuck are ya doin'?
16:00:12 [sbp]
tav?
16:00:21 [sbp]
He he he
16:00:27 [AaronSw]
* AaronSw has not gone stark raving mad.
16:00:47 [sbp]
[[[
16:00:48 [sbp]
[tav PONG!]
16:00:48 [sbp]
-
16:00:48 [sbp]
[tav MWAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!]
16:00:48 [sbp]
-
16:00:48 [sbp]
[tav FEAR_ME_HUMAN!]
16:00:50 [sbp]
]]]
16:00:57 [AaronSw]
Where'd you get that?
16:01:07 [sbp]
From my status window
16:01:09 [sbp]
:-)
16:01:19 [tav]
d'oh!
16:01:21 [AaronSw]
status window?
16:01:35 [sbp]
Yeah, my status window
16:01:50 [deltab]
sbp: SG-1 fan?
16:01:54 [AaronSw]
<Notice> Unknown CTCP request CTCP_FLOOD from tav:
16:02:00 [sbp]
I wondered what on earth was going on for a second...
16:02:07 [sbp]
SG-1: nope
16:02:23 [tav]
anyways
16:02:26 [sbp]
"SG-1" != "The Simpsons"
16:02:32 [deltab]
ah
16:02:36 [sbp]
:-)
16:02:46 [deltab]
that go for futurama too?
16:02:57 [sbp]
Futurama just slips by
16:03:02 [sbp]
Matt Groening
16:03:07 [sbp]
anyway, back to Aaron's lunacy...
16:03:12 [AaronSw]
SG?
16:03:22 [tav]
type: !help in the channel
16:03:54 [AaronSw]
ahh
16:04:03 [sbp]
[[[
16:04:04 [sbp]
> This seems to imply that URI references (that is, URIs with fragment
16:04:05 [sbp]
> identifiers) are not bound to a resource themselves.
16:04:05 [sbp]
Careful... it does not imply that URI references are
16:04:05 [sbp]
bound to resources; but nor does it imply that they are *not*
16:04:05 [sbp]
bound to resources. RFC2396 is silent on what
16:04:06 [sbp]
a URI reference is bound to.
16:04:09 [sbp]
]]] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2001May/0018
16:04:17 [deltab]
AaronSw: Stargate SG-1
16:04:28 [AaronSw]
ahh
16:04:53 [AaronSw]
[[[
16:04:55 [AaronSw]
That definition is wrong. So are the definitions used by RDF. That's
16:04:55 [AaronSw]
why they keep having semantic problems with the Web.
16:05:02 [AaronSw]
]]] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2001May/0019
16:05:57 [AaronSw]
When Roy Fielding says "Just shoot me." then something is wrong.
16:06:39 [sbp]
But the logic of the argument simply doesn't make sense
16:06:50 [AaronSw]
Hey, I thought you agreed with me on this.
16:07:06 [sbp]
no way! not if it means deprecating URI views
16:07:31 [AaronSw]
Why do you like URI-views?
16:07:31 [sbp]
if #a and #b are different views of some URI identified resource, then they must identify distinct "things". we just call those things RDF resources
16:07:41 [sbp]
because they're being used, and they work
16:07:52 [AaronSw]
But they don't work with everyone else.
16:08:02 [sbp]
I'm not the worlds biggest fan... but they still work
16:08:11 [sbp]
with everyone else? who else is there?
16:08:25 [AaronSw]
HTTP, URI spec, etc.
16:08:28 [sbp]
they work with RDF, that's all they need to work with
16:08:33 [AaronSw]
Pfft!
16:08:41 [sbp]
why is it incompatable with HTTP and the URI spec.?
16:08:46 [AaronSw]
Fine, well just change the name to Deely Description Format and I won't care.
16:08:59 [AaronSw]
But as long as you claim to be describing Resources, then you better well be.
16:09:01 [sbp]
* sbp agrees
16:09:23 [sbp]
Ah, so it's just a terminology thing. Well, that's easy to fix, and I very much agree that it should be
16:09:24 [AaronSw]
It's incompatible with HTTP because fragments are not sent in an HTTP request.
16:09:51 [AaronSw]
It's incompatible with URIs because URIs claim that they are not bound to resources and the fragment receives its semantics from the mime type in a data transfer
16:10:19 [sbp]
But if the RDF fragments identify soem view of an RDF document (which they should do) then there isn't even a the...
16:10:54 [AaronSw]
There isn't? What about RDF embedded in HTML... Shouldn't it receive semantics from XPointer?
16:11:03 [AaronSw]
XPointer says it's a location-set or something
16:12:31 [sbp]
sorry, got called away
16:12:53 [sbp]
RDF in HTML: then if you have <a id="blargh">, "#blargh" identifes that deeley
16:13:35 [sbp]
if you have <rdf:Description rdf:about="#blargh">, then you have some additional information about that (well, you don't really, and RDF-in-XHTML is nuts anyway)
16:13:57 [sbp]
if you embed RDF in XHTML, you'll have to send it as a new MIME type
16:14:05 [AaronSw]
"if you have <a id="blargh">, "#blargh" identifes that deeley" what deeley? the thing the contents of the <a> describe?
16:14:35 [sbp]
whatever the HTML 4.01 specification (reference from the text/html RFC) says it identifies
16:14:52 [sbp]
s/reference/referenced
16:19:34 [sbp]
Hmm... I think you should go through some of DanC's mails on the subject: very insightful
16:19:43 [sbp]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2001May/0020
16:19:56 [AaronSw]
I have gone thru all of them.
16:20:04 [AaronSw]
I've studied a lot on this subject, trust me.
16:20:07 [sbp]
that's a response to Roy Fielding, who actually didn't understand the problem first of all
16:20:20 [AaronSw]
Pfft! Roy understands this all very well.
16:20:27 [AaronSw]
I consider him the foremost authority on the subject.
16:20:29 [sbp]
So does Dan
16:20:33 [tav]
hmz
16:20:43 [AaronSw]
Roy wrote a dissertation on the subject, for goodness sake!
16:20:50 [AaronSw]
He wrote the book!
16:20:54 [AaronSw]
He wrote the spec!
16:20:57 [AaronSw]
He wrote the software!
16:21:03 [sbp]
No, he *co*-wrote the spec
16:21:19 [AaronSw]
Fine.
16:21:23 [AaronSw]
Point still stands.
16:21:32 [AaronSw]
He wrote both specs, mind you.
16:21:36 [AaronSw]
err, co-wrote
16:21:47 [AaronSw]
Dan Connolly wrote... neither?
16:21:58 [AaronSw]
err, co-wrote
16:22:04 [sbp]
I'm not saying that he didn't understand URI architecture, I'm saying that he didn't understand initially what was being discussed in that thread. He must have read your email too fast or something
16:22:25 [sbp]
so just because he didn't write the spec means that he knows nothing about URIs?
16:22:41 [sbp]
writing specifications is no indication of how much or how little one knows about a subject
16:23:08 [AaronSw]
What indicates to you that he didn't understand what was being discussed
16:23:09 [AaronSw]
?
16:23:32 [sbp]
read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2001May/0020
16:23:40 [AaronSw]
I have!
16:23:41 [AaronSw]
I just did!
16:23:50 [sbp]
[[[
16:23:51 [sbp]
> > I don't think so; I think you're reading more into RFC2396
16:23:51 [sbp]
> > than is there. (you're certainly not the first, and
16:23:51 [sbp]
> > I don't expect you'll be the last.)
16:23:51 [sbp]
>
16:23:51 [sbp]
> No, that is correct.
16:23:53 [sbp]
The interpretation he's asking about says that
16:23:55 [sbp]
http://example.org/q#foo
16:23:57 [sbp]
and
16:23:59 [sbp]
http://example.org/q#bar
16:24:01 [sbp]
identify the same resource.
16:24:03 [sbp]
]]]
16:24:05 [sbp]
he had to point out what the question was
16:24:25 [AaronSw]
Pff, you're reading too much into that.
16:24:39 [sbp]
and you'd know all about that... :-)
16:24:40 [AaronSw]
It's DanC's debate tactics again.
16:26:43 [tav]
tav has quit
16:31:29 [AaronSw]
Anyway, what's the problem with deprecating URI views?
16:31:58 [sbp]
the problem is that loads of current software supports and implements it, and it works
16:32:25 [AaronSw]
So? If we take it out, none of that software will break.
16:32:35 [AaronSw]
Loads of current software doesn't support it.
16:32:51 [AaronSw]
If RDF is to build on top of URIs and HTTP, it can't very well go around changing them!
16:33:21 [AaronSw]
If we just want to make RDF 1.0 random loser language instead of the foundation for the Semantic Web, it'd be OK. But we're supposed to be making it the foundation of the Semantic Web!
16:34:15 [sbp]
it works (the URI-views work... some other parts are messed up)!
16:35:21 [tav]
tav has joined #swhack
16:36:13 [sbp]
You keep saying that it's incompatable with URIs and HTTP, and yet I see no evidence for that
16:36:30 [sbp]
* sbp has to run soon
16:37:08 [AaronSw]
You can't ask an HTTP server for a URI-view.
16:37:18 [AaronSw]
The URI spec doesn't give them any semantics.
16:37:41 [sbp]
The URI spec doesn't define their semantics. So what?
16:38:02 [AaronSw]
Well, they're not URIs.
16:38:07 [sbp]
And so what if you can't ask a server for a URI view? Does that mean URI-views in total are broken
16:38:16 [sbp]
OF course they're not URIs. So?
16:38:23 [AaronSw]
Well, yes, insofar as they are part of web architecture. They're broken.
16:38:29 [AaronSw]
They're not part of the Web.
16:38:38 [AaronSw]
They're a screwed up legacy mistake that no one knows how to fix
16:38:46 [AaronSw]
To be quite honest.
16:39:45 [sbp]
I think that thwey do exactly what they were intended to do, and I don't know how you can call that broken
16:40:39 [AaronSw]
What were they intended to do?
16:40:52 [sbp]
point to a view of a document
16:41:12 [AaronSw]
And how does that make sense in a web where not all resources are documents?!
16:41:28 [sbp]
s/document/resource
16:41:37 [AaronSw]
It made sense at the beginnings of the Web, when we just had documents sent over wires, but now it no longer fits.
16:41:41 [AaronSw]
What's a view of a resource?
16:41:46 [AaronSw]
It's meaningless.
16:41:49 [AaronSw]
The URI spec says so.
16:41:58 [AaronSw]
If not in so many words.
16:42:12 [sbp]
"the URI spec does not ascribe a meaning to it" != "it is meaningless"
16:43:12 [AaronSw]
But it does ascribe a meaning!
16:43:16 [AaronSw]
Read the section of the URI spec.
16:45:21 [sbp]
many apologies, I really do have to run now
16:45:30 [sbp]
c'ya
16:46:29 [AaronSw]
bye!
16:48:31 [sbp]
sbp has quit
17:34:26 [xena]
xena has joined #swhack
18:15:32 [xena]
xena has quit
18:15:36 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
18:31:25 [sbp]
sbp has quit
19:09:00 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
19:17:40 [sbp]
Wow...
19:17:41 [sbp]
[[[
19:17:42 [sbp]
At the heart of the Access US network is a Cisco GSR 12000 series router capable of transferring over 1.5 Gigs of data per second. That is 1,000 T-1 lines!
19:17:46 [sbp]
]]] - http://www.accessus.net/hostingcolocation/hosting.asp
19:22:18 [AaronSw]
hi
19:22:37 [sbp]
Hi
19:22:59 [AaronSw]
What's Access US?
19:23:20 [AaronSw]
Or rather, why are you interested in them?
19:24:33 [sbp]
I was looking for a site on busprod.com, but it seems that all of the busprod.com sites have gone, and busprod.com itself redirects to Access US
19:47:35 [AaronSw]
"We apologize for the inconvenience of this, but it is imperative that we ensure our network is not assisting in the propagation of this, or any, worm. All of us are part of a larger community, and it really isn't cool to infect your neighbors." , http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,47037,00.html
19:47:41 [AaronSw]
Heh! "Patrick being the king of QName doom" - mid:020101c14462$971f9e00$55ed93c3@y0r1d9
19:47:49 [AaronSw]
Heh: "BTW, this isn't IRC; you might want to lurk before using such a l33t name." - http://wmf.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$5780
19:47:54 [AaronSw]
/nick ==l333tman!==
19:48:06 [sbp]
<sbp> l33t?
19:48:07 [sbp]
<AaronSw> 3l337 == eleet = elite
19:48:07 [sbp]
<AaronSw> 31337, rather
19:48:07 [sbp]
<sbp> oh yeah. How ever did I miss that? :-)
19:48:07 [sbp]
<AaronSw> I know!
19:48:07 [sbp]
<sbp> :-)
19:48:09 [sbp]
<AaronSw> You're apparently not very l33t
19:48:11 [sbp]
<sbp> l33t?
19:48:13 [sbp]
<AaronSw> 3l337 == l33t == eleet == elite
19:48:15 [sbp]
<AaronSw> 31337, rather
19:48:17 [sbp]
<sbp> oh yeah. How ever did I miss that? :-)
19:48:19 [sbp]
<AaronSw> I know!
19:48:21 [sbp]
<sbp> :-)
19:48:23 [sbp]
<sbp> we're odd people
19:48:25 [sbp]
<AaronSw> indeed.
19:48:27 [sbp]
<sbp> Hmm... that's something I don't do often
19:48:29 [sbp]
<AaronSw> Oops! I meant to paste all of this into swhack!
19:48:31 [sbp]
<sbp> converting documents to HTML 3.2, changing <hr /> to <hr>. Scary
19:48:33 [sbp]
<sbp> paste what?
19:48:35 [sbp]
<sbp> Oh, heh!
19:48:37 [sbp]
<sbp> Well, no one will know anyway, and you can always copy it over
19:48:39 [sbp]
<AaronSw> Sorry guys!
19:48:53 [AaronSw]
Well I'm not sorry for you guys.
19:49:59 [AaronSw]
Heh! http://www.macaddict.com/osx/hacks/megaicon.html
19:50:42 [sbp]
What IRC client do you use? Shadow?
19:50:50 [AaronSw]
Snak
19:51:08 [sbp]
lol: "is that a 928 pixel icon on your desktop, or are you just happy to see me?"
19:51:31 [AaronSw]
* AaronSw tries the hack... watch out. ;-)
19:53:27 [sbp]
:-)
19:53:45 [ADVAC0N]
ADVAC0N has joined #swhack
19:54:01 [sbp]
Hi Advacon
19:54:06 [ADVAC0N]
hey
19:54:21 [AaronSw]
Hmm, doesn't seem to have worked.
19:54:25 [sbp]
Bummer
19:54:45 [Max109]
Max109 has joined #swhack
19:54:55 [sbp]
Blimey, where are all these people coming from?
19:55:16 [sbp]
Anyway...
19:55:18 [sbp]
Gotta run
19:55:21 [AaronSw]
Bye
19:55:24 [sbp]
c'ya
19:55:25 [ADVAC0N]
why has subseven.mine.nu been down for so long?
19:55:36 [AaronSw]
Just a note guy, this channel is about _hacking_ not cracking.
19:55:43 [AaronSw]
s/guy/guys/
19:55:55 [ADVAC0N]
lol
19:56:07 [ADVAC0N]
i was just wondering why its been down for so long
19:57:40 [ADVAC0N]
ok cya
19:57:41 [ADVAC0N]
ADVAC0N has left #swhack
19:58:26 [sbp]
sbp has quit
20:13:05 [Max109]
Max109 has quit
21:24:56 [AaronSw]
* AaronSw plays some music *really loud*!
21:35:52 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack
21:36:15 [AaronSw]
hi
21:36:24 [sbp]
Hi there
21:36:27 [xena]
xena has joined #swhack
21:36:37 [sbp]
xena!
21:41:33 [sbp]
lol @ s/cracking/hacking
21:42:29 [AaronSw]
heh
21:48:33 [sbp]
He he he
21:48:33 [sbp]
[[[
21:48:34 [sbp]
The Smartest Dog Ever
21:48:34 [sbp]
As a butcher is shooing a dog from his shop, he sees $10 and a note in his mouth, reading: "10 lamb chops, please."
21:48:34 [sbp]
Amazed, he takes the money, puts a bag of chops in the dog's mouth, and quickly closes the shop. He follows the dog and watches him wait for a green light, look both ways, and trot across the road to a bus stop. The dog checks the timetable and sits on the bench. When a bus arrives, he walks around to the front and looks at the number, then boards the bus. The butcher follows, dumbstruck.
21:48:37 [sbp]
As the bus travels out into the suburbs, the dog takes in the scenery. After awhile he stands on his back paws to push the "stop" button, then the butcher follows him off.
21:48:40 [sbp]
The dog runs up to a house and drops his bag on the stoop. He goes back down the path, takes a big run, and throws himself -Whap!- against the door. He does this again and again. No answer. So he jumps on a wall, walks around the garden, beats his head against a window, jumps off, and waits at the front door. A big guy opens it and starts cursing and pummeling the dog.
21:48:45 [sbp]
21:48:47 [sbp]
The butcher runs up screams at the guy: "What the hell are you doing? This dog's a genius!"
21:48:49 [sbp]
The owner responds, "Genius, my ass. It's the second time this week he's forgotten his key!"
21:48:53 [sbp]
]]] - http://www.thecomedylab.com/jokes/results/detail.asp?id=9620&sql=1&cat=26
21:50:14 [AaronSw]
Heh!
21:53:49 [sbp]
he he he, from the same site: "You have to stay in shape. My mother started walking five miles a day when she was 60. She's 97 now and we have no idea where she is."
21:54:51 [AaronSw]
Heh.
21:56:32 [AaronSw]
Gotta run.
21:57:29 [sbp]
O.K., c'ya
21:57:45 [AaronSw]
AaronSw has quit
22:43:37 [sbp]
sbp has quit
23:03:24 [xena]
xena has quit
23:44:13 [tav]
tav has quit
23:45:40 [sbp]
sbp has joined #swhack