00:37:37 logster has joined #swhack 00:37:37 topic is: Join #swhack. Sean chats there. 00:37:37 Users on #swhack: logster Morbus tav AaronSw deltab 00:37:45 replay for loggy: 00:37:49 aww, shoot 00:37:49 heh. is that off your machine? 00:37:49 my server 00:37:49 which is in NY :-( 00:37:50 oh poo. 00:37:50 they seem to be having some internet problems there 00:37:52 i heard a bunch of t3's were down in that area. 00:37:54 i wouldn't be surprised 00:37:56 I doubt the isp contracts cover acts of terrorism 00:37:58 i doubt it. or else they took down the server to install carnivore 00:38:00 heh! 00:38:02 :) 00:38:04 Took me like an hour to get into AG, this morning... but once i did, it rocked! 00:38:06 yeah !!! 00:38:08 now i've been disconnected. :-( 00:38:10 i was like that too. i tried the first version, tried hard, and gave up and said it swucked 00:38:12 second version came out, i perservered and now i love the damn thing 00:38:14 whatever you do, don't drag and drop over it in os x ;) 00:38:16 Oh? 00:38:18 immediate crash 00:38:20 so don't place it anywhere near the dock. it must have taken me about three dozen crashes 'fore i got smart. 00:38:22 heh 00:38:24 gotta run... dinner 00:38:26 Notice: A: http://www.digitalcity.jst.go.jp/meeting/ from jhendler 00:38:28 Notice: titled item A 00:38:30 Notice: commented item A 00:38:32 back 00:38:34 what'd ya have? 00:38:36 pizza 00:38:38 Hmm, MacSatellite should have a "keep trying to conenct" feature... 00:38:40 Is there a newer version out? 00:38:42 yay, server's back 00:50:59 welp, there is a newer version with that feautre, i think. according to the version tracker. 00:51:06 i think it just came out recently. 1.2 00:51:27 hey, i heard somewhere that any shell/bsd script you have in os x, you can add a .command to it and have it runnable via a doubleclick 00:51:33 i'm gonna try it on ampheta a little later tonight 00:52:32 cool 00:52:41 if the vt isn't offering the macsatellite 1.2 (it wasn't this morning), lemme know and i'll email it to yo 00:52:50 I think I have 1.2... i remember seeing something about this feature in release notes 00:55:11 yeah. you probably do then. i think it does timeout eventually. i'm impatient though 00:55:54 it timesout really quickly, tho... 01:01:25 whoo. now i get to code perl 01:05:33 tav told me that perl was below me even talking about, so i won't. ;-) 01:05:48 man oh man. i don't even know why i come here 01:09:45 I don't think it's a very good tactic, but that's what he said they taught him in pyAdvocacy 01:10:10 bwahahah. i'm all for a little bit of advocacy, but i'd rather judge the result. 01:12:22 hmz, can you mail me macsatellite 1.2? 01:12:27 yuppers 01:12:30 whataddy? 01:12:49 me@aaronsw.com 01:19:10 on its way 01:19:20 thanks 01:20:04 are photos written width x height 01:20:38 i dunno. i always screw that too. think screen res. 01:20:39 or the other way around? 01:20:47 yeah, wxh. 640x480 01:21:16 ok, thanks 01:26:09 Hmmz, stuffit says your file is bad 01:29:00 Great, and now it's gone and deleted it... 01:29:34 oh joy. 01:29:50 lemme throw it publically here and you can grab it off apache 01:29:55 ok, thanks 01:30:39 try 63.173.138.120 01:31:37 cool 01:32:27 yeah, that's me. 01:32:31 now stop pokng around 01:32:39 you and you're nosy apache logs! 01:33:02 heheh, tail -f. i track j0000! 01:35:02 hmz, download seems to have stalled 01:35:33 wham, and Morbus falls off the face of the Earth... right in the middle of my download :-( 01:36:03 Morbus has quit 01:42:45 sbp has joined #swhack 01:49:59 Hi sbp 01:49:59 Hi Aaron 01:49:59 aww, shoot 01:49:59 loggy's dead again 01:49:59 aw... 01:49:59 the net connection in ny keeps going up and down tonight 01:49:59 logster, hello? 01:49:59 Disconnected from irc.openprojects.net (ERROR :Closing Link: logster[xcdfddb76.ip.ggn.net] by forward.openprojects.net (Ping timeout for logster[xcdfddb76.ip.ggn.net])) 01:50:05 logster has joined #swhack 01:50:05 topic is: Join #swhack. Sean chats there. 01:50:05 Users on #swhack: logster sbp tav deltab AaronSw 01:50:56 replay for logster: 01:50:58 did you fix n3tordf? 01:50:59 neat, mentions the n3tordf form, and the Wiki (I presume RDFWiki): http://www.cs.umd.edu/~hendler/CMSC498x/asst1.html 01:50:59 :-) 01:50:59 it wasn't broken! 01:50:59 no, not rdfwiki 01:51:00 really? 01:51:02 jhendler set up a class wiki 01:51:04 Yeah, RDFWiki? 01:51:06 i told him about rdfwiki but couldn't find a pointer 01:51:08 he said he didn't want to teach the class in triples 01:51:10 Heh 01:54:27 grr! why is imagemagick broken 01:54:51 Shame that I missed JimH's class 01:54:51 I wonder if they'll do RDF/SW on my course? Man, that'll be funny 01:54:59 Heh! 01:55:09 There's prolog in my math textbook -- that was funny. 01:55:20 He he he 01:56:37 Hmm... if we could get a class going, maybe we could entice some people to come and talk here 01:57:03 Like who? 02:10:09 We've already got all the good lecturers, here 02:10:47 The usual W3C people 02:10:58 Maybe I could get Eric to give a keynote :-) 02:11:08 Who would attend this class? 02:11:16 Well, anyone doing AI 02:11:22 Like, for example, me 02:11:48 except I probably wouldn't be able to get there. Oh, the irony! I'd crawl 02:12:46 * sbp notes that people are going to be running out of titles for SW papers soon 02:12:51 Heh heh. 02:12:57 Ooh, how about, "SW: WTF?" 02:14:38 "SW4U" 02:14:47 "SW+U" 02:14:58 Doesn't have as many swears... 02:15:45 How about a guide to producing SW systems on WinMe and Unix? 02:15:52 "Me, U, and the SW" 02:16:59 "DAML+OIL: Not yet mined by Bush" 02:17:39 "SWuckit" 02:18:07 "How to SWear" 02:18:41 I'm thinking SWAG should release a promotional video... 02:18:44 "RDF? SWanky" 02:18:54 "The Spy who SWAGged Me"? 02:19:05 lol 02:21:06 "I'm dirty right to the RDF Core, baby" 02:22:40 lol 02:24:25 You know, when they rename RDF IG the SWIG, the headlines will be: 02:24:35 "W3C Puts SWIG to Community's SWAG" 02:25:01 * sbp wondered when that one would be spouted... 02:25:38 We have RDF, SWIG, SWAG, SWIPT, SWEO, DAML... 02:25:48 SWAD 02:25:53 Brownie points if you can put them all in a sentence 02:26:36 There are many acronyms that pertain to Semantic Web related things, including RDF, SWIG, SWAG, SWIPT, SWEO, DAML, and SAWD 02:26:40 There are many acronyms that pertain to Semantic Web related things, including RDF, SWIG, SWAG, SWIPT, SWEO, DAML, and SWAD 02:26:56 * sbp collects his brownie points 02:27:14 Oh, come on -- a funny sentence! 02:27:48 well, that's assez funny 02:28:24 assez? 02:28:37 Don't worry about it... 02:28:38 Like, that's as unfunny as an arse? 02:29:03 I'll have you know, many of the arses that I've seen are very... oops, I've said too much 02:43:31 Ego gratification: 02:43:35 gee, a lot of stuff in your papers by this Berners-Lee guy, he must be a pretty smart cookie :-> 02:43:40 btw, this semanticweb-long piece is the best description of the "layer cake" I've seen yet - has Tim seen it? 02:43:49 this SW long paper is really good! I think I'll only steal a little so you can publish it somewhere better later - needs a little editing, and to remove a few of the "I"s to make it more general, but heck of a nice writing job - needs to be seen 02:44:11 And funny: 02:44:28 favorite example [from the Sci-Am piece]: Get me the phone number of everyone who ordered more than 1,000 widgets and was arrested in the last 6 months." 02:44:34 And back to ego: 02:45:17 actually, I've written quite a lot - and w/a lot of people - the ability to make complex ideas simple is very hard -- you've definitely got the knack. you can quote me on that! 03:02:38 Morbus has joined #swhack 03:02:44 welcome back! 03:02:54 sigh. i'm just not having a good day 03:03:00 heh. thanks ;) 03:03:19 * AaronSw picks up his download again 03:03:34 diff ip. you should be able to use the name too 03:03:45 yeah, i already started 03:03:50 thank goodness for 206! 03:04:18 k. i think, actually, that you caused my crash earlier ... i've noticed some crazy stuff when doing more uploading then downloading on usb modems. 03:04:20 206? 03:04:30 Sure, blame it on me. 03:04:31 206 Partial Content 03:04:38 lets me pick up my download where i left off 03:04:44 ah 03:05:00 Go Apache! 03:05:07 :) 03:06:10 Ooh, new icon! 03:06:36 yah :) 03:06:51 thanks, this is much nicer 03:07:06 np. for some reason, its not available on versiontracker any more 03:07:07 Morbus has left #swhack 03:07:39 Morbus has joined #swhack 03:07:44 bwahaha. man, i suck so hardcore 03:07:56 i wanna put on a corky hat 03:08:04 not avail: Yeah, the guy's site went down 03:08:17 well, hell, i should mirror it on disobey then 03:09:16 yeah! 03:19:08 scary: http://www.catseye.mb.ca/esoteric/mdpn/index.html 03:19:57 oh, geez 03:20:50 Befunge is weird... it's so easy to learn, but it looks *really* scary 03:20:57 yeah, no kidding 03:21:03 And it's quite fun to program; there are some really weird challenges 03:21:29 Morbus has quit 03:21:48 there goes morbus, again 03:30:32 * sbp feels like creating a language 03:30:48 * sbp gives in immediately, too difficult 03:34:10 Wow! This is how I was going to comment my "tag:" befunge program: http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/oma/quux/qsort.html 03:34:43 * AaronSw fights with Oracle and Tcl... 03:34:58 heh, some struggle 03:35:11 it's been taking me a long time, but I think I've got it now... 03:35:27 That commenting is really cool. 03:35:58 Good, isn't it? But now I'll never be able to prove that I thought of the same thing independantly 03:36:07 Still, who cares? I'm going to do it anyway 03:36:14 Heh 03:36:17 If I can remember how my code works, which is less than likely 03:36:19 "//:ptth"v > v >$$$v 03:36:20 >,# :# _$>0~0\>:25*-#v_^>\8 p1+:v 03:36:20 @ > v^ < 03:36:20 ^_v#--1*5 9:g8:+1$< > ^ >3":"v 03:36:20 > v > :,^ < 03:36:20 $v < < < 03:36:22 $>$"/"> , 1 + :8g:59*-#v_^ 03:36:24 ^_^#-*2*82: <_^# -+2*87:< 03:36:44 I abbreviated it quite a lot... here's an earlier version:- 03:36:55 v >:25*-#v_>$$$v 03:36:55 > v0 03:36:55 >"//:ptth">,# :# _$>0~0\:25*-#v_@> \9p1+:v 03:36:55 @ > v^ < 03:36:55 ^_v#--1*5 9:g9:+1$<> ^> >:9g:78*2+-#v_v 03:36:56 > v > :,^ <^ +1$< 03:36:58 $v < < < ^ < 03:37:00 $>$"/"> , 1 + :9g:59*-#v_^ 03:37:02 ^_^#-*2*82: <_^# -+2*87:< 03:38:00 I noticed how I was reusing the same :25*-#v bit of code, and thought I'd just put a pointer in before it 03:38:45 hmm 03:38:49 shoot, i keep screwing up! 03:39:26 Gotta run 03:39:37 c'ya 03:42:28 sbp has quit 07:09:08 deltab has quit 07:09:08 tav has quit 07:09:08 AaronSw has quit 07:09:14 Disconnected from irc.openprojects.net (Connection reset by peer) 07:09:24 logster has joined #swhack 07:09:24 topic is: Join #swhack. Sean chats there. 07:09:24 Users on #swhack: logster tav AaronSw deltab 07:37:31 IceSlice has joined #swhack 07:37:37 IceSlice has left #swhack 08:17:38 Disconnected from irc.openprojects.net (ERROR :Closing Link: logster[xcdfddb76.ip.ggn.net] by forward.openprojects.net (Ping timeout for logster[xcdfddb76.ip.ggn.net])) 08:17:56 logster has joined #swhack 08:17:56 Users on #swhack: logster AaronSw deltab tav 12:52:06 AaronSw has quit 13:55:43 AaronSw has joined #swhack 14:13:31 AaronSw has quit 14:18:40 AaronSw has joined #swhack 14:50:30 AaronSw has quit 17:55:20 AaronSw has joined #swhack 18:14:52 Heh: http://wmf.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$5694 18:50:08 Disconnected from irc.openprojects.net (ERROR :Closing Link: logster[xcdfddb76.ip.ggn.net] by niven.openprojects.net (Ping timeout for logster[xcdfddb76.ip.ggn.net])) 18:50:11 logster has joined #swhack 18:50:11 Users on #swhack: logster AaronSw deltab tav 20:08:59 Morbus has joined #swhack 20:14:22 ugh, where did graphic converter save this file? 20:14:40 And why does it think i've been using it for 103 days? 20:14:41 i just downloaded it! 20:14:42 heh. bad graphic converter! 20:14:52 cos you probably didn't delete your prefs. 20:15:27 i love how the "please pay up" delay increases exponentially :-( 20:16:06 i got a serial around here somewhere. 20:16:39 it's good to know that someone pays for there software 20:17:09 i've been using it for years. wonderful little program. 20:17:28 yeah, me too 20:22:21 somedays i do wish i hadn't made ampheta open source so that i could have teh chance to charge for it. 20:22:32 i had a big discussion about this on the free software business list a bit ago. 20:22:41 but then, after breaking it all done, again, i'm happy with the open source choice. 20:23:52 "breaking it all done"? 20:24:00 s/done/down/ 20:24:23 oh 20:24:31 tyring to find the archive now 20:25:35 oh, your foo.command trick worked 20:25:44 I just tested it out a little while ago -- very neat 20:25:46 it did? kickass. what'd you try it on. 20:26:00 that's really cool. i can now make an easy installer for os x with that then. 20:26:04 or you could . 20:26:07 i just wrote a short shell script: "echo foo" 20:26:31 Opens up a new terminal window, tho 20:26:53 well, that's ok. if people are gonna run it as a shell on os x anyways, i'd want that since its the only visual que. 20:27:01 i have a classic os gui just like win32 in the cvs. 20:27:11 little buggy, but i should be working the final stuff out. 20:27:21 What's the GUI look like? 20:27:28 doesn't scale well though - i'm really pushing the limits of the macperl gui stuff. so i've added a no_gui config line 20:27:33 disobey.com/amphetadesk/screenshots.htm 20:27:49 it's really just that small little box. just a gui element around the normal STDOUT stuff. 20:27:59 and all configurable of course - you can replace the image with what you wish. 20:28:24 Ahh, neat. 20:28:54 I like how you switch between Win32 and MacOS 20:29:12 here's that thread: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?sss:6076:200107:jecdnpdnmnlacjdakbib#b 20:29:25 hmm? switch? whatcha mean? in the code? 20:29:40 err, in the screenshots 20:29:49 oh. ok :) 20:31:07 Wow, you got a response from Michael Tiemann. Neat. 20:31:27 :) 20:32:29 Maybe you can go like Ximian and create open-source nagware. ;-) 20:33:09 hehehe... i could add banners into the html source code ... so few pepopel customize it 20:33:21 Exactly, smart people get it for free! 20:35:08 hehe. there ya go 20:42:47 Morbus has left #swhack 22:00:35 sbp has joined #swhack 22:00:58 hello there 22:01:04 Hi Aaron 22:01:21 [ foaf:name "Sean B. Palmer"; :wrote "0v_^#-3:+1,,\"> \"< -\n >\"<\" >,~:25#$*^\n >\".\",@^ _^#<" ] . 22:01:36 Oh, shoot. 22:01:42 I wonder if that's the shortest possible RDF/SW program 22:01:45 What does this one do? 22:01:55 * sbp pastes it in in non-N3 form 22:01:55 0v_^#-3:+1,,"> "< - 22:01:56 >"<" >,~:25#$*^ 22:01:56 >".",@^ _^#< 22:02:14 this one simply takes in three URIs from input, and outputs an N3 triple 22:02:26 not the most stunning program ever... 22:02:38 but it 22:02:46 's short enough to put in a signature 22:02:57 Heh! 22:03:15 took ages to compress it that small 22:03:15 * AaronSw wonders if he should learn befunge-93 just to go around scaring people. 22:03:37 Imagine cwm in befunge-93! 22:03:54 yeah, you can jump out at people, and instead of saying "boo!", just ask them if they're programmers, and if so, shove a b93 program at them, and run off laughing 22:04:06 CWM in b93: it would probably make more sense 22:04:13 * AaronSw files that in his Halloween decorations list 22:04:20 :-) 22:04:55 Interesting: 22:05:01 """I won't be working on this much, as my time is currently consumed by my active 22:05:01 participation in the "Bay Area Gotterdammerung, Job Search, and Chili-Cookoff"""" 22:05:08 Poor excuse. ;-) 22:05:17 where from? what context? 22:05:35 - http://www.opennsd.org/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00001I&topic_id=1&topic=OpenNSD 22:05:55 Heh: 22:05:59 """1/ put pictures in the right directory 22:06:00 2/ add metadata using java -jar rdfpic.jar /* 22:06:00 3/ generate thumbnails (in png) and index file[s] using a single script, 22:06:00 genepage 22:06:00 And if I'm lazy I just skip 2, but it is bad.""" 22:06:08 mid:Pine.GSO.4.33.0109150000080.28441-100000@tarantula.inria.fr 22:06:10 Hmm... 22:06:48 Guess this came too late for DanC: 22:06:54 """CALL 1-877-322-9438 TO CHECK STATUS OF 22:06:54 ALL MAJOR U.S. AIRPORTS, AIRPORT SECURITY POLICIES AND 22:06:54 FAA TRAVEL BRIEFINGS""" 22:07:01 * sbp thinks he might have found a way to compress it even more 22:07:26 * sbp was mistaken 22:08:47 it's actually quite a sophisticated little deeley, for what it does, because the b93 input method is (as you would expect) really strange. It doesn't take in a string and put it in a variable 22:08:51 that would be too easy! 22:09:12 I had trouble believing it could take input 22:09:23 You come up to the input character, and you have to keep putting the pointer over that character to get each character... aaargh! 22:09:41 heheh 22:09:42 Here, I'll try to find an interpreter for you... 22:10:13 And you thought Python's whitespace requirements were bad! 22:10:23 yeah... 22:10:52 there doesn't seem to be an interpreter for the Mac: http://www.catseye.mb.ca/esoteric/befunge/93/index.html 22:11:03 I use VisBef 22:11:18 brb 22:11:32 one for linux should work too 22:12:19 Ahh, here's one in perl...hmz 404 22:12:52 And the ANSI C one should work... eh? 500 22:13:10 they all seem to have gone down, or whatever 22:13:55 I might write an interpreter in Python... 22:13:55 Aha! It 22:14:01 It's b93 terrorism! 22:14:25 You couldn't possibly write an interpreter in Python -- your brain would explode. 22:14:39 lol 22:14:40 You'll have to study the great Python obfuscation techniques first 22:14:45 No really, it's quite a simple language 22:15:16 It just *looks* really tough. And even when you've programmed some code, after you go back to it, you wonder what on earth you've done 22:15:56 heh! 22:16:19 remember the guy who did the color coded thing? He said he didn't have a clue what many of the bits were for 22:16:27 and he wrote the program 22:16:32 sheesh 22:17:09 you can kind of make sense of my three-line thing 22:17:13 0v_^#-3:+1,,"> "< - 22:17:13 >"<" >,~:25#$*^ 22:17:13 >".",@^ _^#< 22:17:33 the "> " "<" and "." are clearly bits that get output 22:17:42 ~ is the keyboard input character 22:17:50 @ ends the program 22:18:09 , pops a value from the stack and returns it as an alphabetical character 22:18:22 _ is an "if" thingy 22:18:34 >v<^ control the direction of the pointer 22:18:55 numeric values just go in the stack... note that you can only put single digit numbers in the stack 22:19:14 if you want to put 10 in, you have to do 25* 22:19:37 i.e., put 2 in the stack, then put 5 in the stack. * multiplies the two top numbers in the stack, and replaces them with the result 22:20:10 whitespace is just skipped 22:20:10 ahh 22:20:38 "#" forms a bridge over the next character, so in #,1 the comma is ignored, when going from L to R 22:21:01 : duplicates the top value in the stack 22:21:22 Hmm... and that's about all you need to know for that program 22:21:41 and $ pops 22:21:48 yep 22:21:53 deltab, you a b93 coder? 22:22:06 he's the guy who got me into this! 22:22:16 yeah 22:22:23 I am? 22:22:25 Oh? 22:22:28 How so? 22:22:34 I was searching for info on DB when we were looking for the mysterious "DB homepage", and I came across this 22:22:40 heh 22:23:02 url for the DB homepage? 22:23:10 there isn't one 22:23:22 oh, i see 22:23:28 I was searching for it, and found b93 instead :-) 22:23:48 Ahh, I see: http://www.purists.org/esoteric/ 22:23:57 yep 22:23:58 you could say my homepage is hosted by google 22:24:04 lol 22:24:19 heh 22:24:31 cool, it's a DB-contributed DB. 22:24:35 but I'm not so egocentric as to make a page of links just to things about me :-) 22:24:56 db: what's the best esoteric language in your opinion? Are there any other better languages I could be trying? Any more compact and weird than b93? 22:24:56 I see it as every person's responsibility to catalog data about themselves. 22:25:06 If everyone does that, then we've got a lot of data catalogged. 22:25:20 certainly weirder ones 22:25:37 but b93 works! I was so shocked when it did 22:25:58 befunge is fun 22:26:11 heh - "putting the fun in befunge" 22:26:17 lol 22:26:45 without the fun it'd be just... bege 22:31:36 there's one language based on colour and shade changes in a bitmap - looks somewhat like that befunge qsort program without the symbols 22:32:00 Heh, you could have a program that draws a picture of itself 22:32:05 http://www.purists.org/esoteric/i11152.html 22:33:36 oh, wow! 22:34:59 Hmm... can't find any compilers for it though 22:37:56 Programmed assembly, Sean? 22:39:07 Heh: 22:39:07 [[[ 22:39:09 ESOGOTSCHI has an infinite number of ways of representing the number 3, making ESOGOTSCHI very useful for people that like to spend some time writing the number 3 in infinite ways. 22:39:15 ]]] - http://www.p-nand-q.com/scripts/gosub.py?page=http://www.p-nand-q.com/esogotschi.htm 22:39:29 Programmed what? I meant interpreters 22:40:48 Ugh: http://www.p-nand-q.com/sorted/hello.txt 22:41:45 [[[ 22:41:46 Java2K is not a deterministic programming language, but a probabilistic one. Even for built-in functions, there is only a certain probability the function will do whatever you intend it to do. 22:41:51 ]]] - http://www.p-nand-q.com/scripts/gosub.py?page=http://www.p-nand-q.com/java2k.htm 22:41:59 No different to any other programming language :-) 22:42:44 Yeah, I liked Java2K 22:43:08 I think it's a bit cruddy. Too much repetition 22:43:24 Well, I'm just commenting on the idea 22:43:25 if it looks like a TM... 22:43:31 Assembly language, have you programmed it? 22:43:36 Ah, the idea is cool :-) 22:43:41 Assembly language? 22:44:02 oh, dear 22:44:36 Assembly language is like machine language -- very low-level 22:44:50 You just tell the CPU what to do. 22:45:02 I know. I remember back to my old C64 days... 22:45:13 I haven't done anything at that level since then 22:45:36 Maybe you could optimize cwm in assembly? ;-) 22:45:41 especially not on Win32 22:52:00 * sbp feels like writing a Befunge interpreter in Python... how hard could it be? 22:52:10 sbp: it's easy 22:52:35 I did one a couple of years ago, but lost it in a disk problem 22:52:39 Aw... 22:52:55 I guess I'll need to create an array for the torus deeley 22:53:32 I'm most proud of how I implemented the proposed stack roll command in one instruction, designed only for positive roll values 22:53:53 out of interest I tried it with zero and negative roll too 22:53:57 and it worked! 22:54:32 oh that's a good point, it has that weirdism where empty stacks always return 0... 22:55:05 also, it supported Nefunge 22:55:39 you must have been bummed when you lost it 22:55:43 yeah 22:55:44 like TimBL losing ENQUIRE 22:56:12 especially as I'd planned to release it before the end of the year 22:56:23 Public Service Announcement: Please back up, often. 22:56:33 Hmm, I met Daniel Biddle in another life: http://www.freeamp.org/pipermail/mm/2001-March/000023.html 22:56:36 VisBef is really good though 22:56:47 Now I know his job! system administrator, espra.net 22:56:50 mwahaha 22:56:55 :-) 22:57:10 * sbp still doesn't know who db is 22:57:27 AaronSw: uh yes, I created your user account :-) 22:57:38 well, except that he's the system asministrator for espra.net, and likes esoteric programming 22:57:45 ohh, good point, deltab ;-) 22:58:10 and that he's nuts enough to hang about on #swhack, and that he knows tav, which is another person that I now very little about 22:58:23 s/now/know 22:58:34 He's an espian. If we tell you anything more, we'll have to kill you. 22:58:39 lol 22:58:59 Seriously, they're big into weapons and beating people up. 22:59:10 uh? 22:59:11 yeah, so I heard 22:59:35 * sbp enjoys AaronSw's disinformation... no, really 22:59:41 And you thought the W3C Confidentiality agreement was harsh! 23:00:01 This isn't disinformation... They have a .... 23:00:11 Sorry, please ignore the above lines. 23:00:22 They were a malfunction by my computer. 23:00:34 Now back to your regularly scheduled channel. 23:00:43 don't believe everything you read 23:01:03 :-) 23:01:45 sbp has quit 23:01:47 * AaronSw finds ESP quite fun, reminds me of my childhood 23:01:52 SeanP has joined #swhack 23:02:04 SeanP has quit 23:02:14 sbp has joined #swhack 23:02:18 Pfft, make up your mind Sean. 23:02:27 * AaronSw goes to delete what Sean missed from the logs... 23:02:32 Pfffff 23:02:43 j/k 23:03:15 ESP has the best mission statement I've ever seen. 23:06:23 do they squiggle? 23:06:31 Err, who? 23:06:42 So, Mr. Sysadmin, why don't the mail archives work, eh? 23:06:54 if you've ever had a goat piss up your leg, you'd know who and why 23:06:57 archives of what? 23:07:02 pardon? 23:07:15 huh? 23:07:23 archives of espian secret lists 23:07:40 they do work 23:07:45 that's just a camouflage 23:07:49 there was no Monty Python on tonight. I was quite dissapp... disapppoin... dissa... upset 23:10:28 So what's the location of the real mail archives? 23:14:15 Woo! http://www.google.com/search?q=URI+RDF+SW 23:14:37 brings up http://infomesh.net/2001/05/sw/, http://swag.semanticweb.org/rdfnsPractises, http://swag.semanticweb.org/whatIsSW 23:16:00 cool 23:16:07 we've got it covered, eh? 23:16:41 absolutely :-) 23:20:26  23:20:28 { { :message :signed :K . :t :derivable :message; :subject :x; :predicate :r; :object :y } log:implies { :x :r :y } } a log:Truth; log:forAll :message, :t, :r, :x, :y . 23:21:53 that makes very little sense 23:22:10 from TimBL, found in http://www.diffuse.org/semantic-web.html 23:22:48 why do you say that? 23:22:57 he's left out some stuff 23:23:29 actually, no... it's just that the ":message :signed :K" bit would have to be derived from other means 23:24:51 could you do a quick pre-review of this for me: http://infomesh.net/2001/09/urischemes/ 23:25:19 sure, just let me pop the stack once 23:25:35 fine 23:25:52 * sbp wonders what on Earth AaronSw is talking about... 23:27:08 I keep a stack of things I need to do. 23:27:13 I was request a chance to do one of them 23:27:39 Love the title! 23:28:02 a stack, in what way? Physical? 23:28:05 thanks 23:28:13 no, conceptual 23:28:16 in my head 23:28:24 ah 23:28:26 like [].pop() 23:28:41 I had a feeling it might be modelled on that 23:28:56 well, that's based on a long CS tradition of stacks as primitive data structures 23:29:13 yep 23:29:22 anyways, You need a mostly harmless reference to complete the joke 23:29:42 in what way? 23:30:01 "Mostly Harmless" by Douglas Adams 23:30:07 I know the book 23:30:13 what reference do I need? 23:30:25 Oh, don't worry, I've got it... 23:30:39 But they're mostly harmful, so it's the opposite 23:30:53 * sbp likes the guy on the 30-50ft poles bit 23:31:10 yes, i know 23:31:25 you need something mostly harmful to complete the balance 23:31:47 well, the new URI schemes are mostly harmful 23:32:07 err, something mostly harmless rather 23:32:11 :-) 23:32:28 :-) 23:32:40 Name one thing that's mostly harmless, other than the Earth, and related to URI schemes 23:33:05 informal URN spaces? 23:34:41 they're completely harmless 23:35:21 well, mostly harmless -- they take up disk space 23:35:36 mental and physical 23:37:22 People aren't familiar with data: URIs! 23:37:43 and tell folks to be sure to register their schemes 23:37:43 I am, and you are, and we're people, so you're wrong, WED 23:37:47 and QED 23:37:57 pffft 23:37:58 do any browsers support them? 23:38:21 Netscape6 supports data: 23:38:53 [[[ 23:38:55 It is often said that new URI schemes in and of themselves are not actually harmful, it is only unregistered proprietary schemes that are harmful. Of course, it is still technically possible for registered URI schemes to violate URI axioms, but new URI schemes and URN namespaces have to go through a process of peer review, and are therefore less likely to do so. 23:38:55 ]]] 23:39:22 I should probably add "REGISTER YOUR SCHEMES!" though 23:39:45 yeah 23:40:11 You need a "call to action" 23:46:43 Hmm... the amount of EO materials for the SW can still only be described as "terrible" 23:47:28 Yeah, i'm hoping the primer will make dent 23:47:50 When are you going to release it?/What are you doing with it? 23:48:13 It seems to have been sitting there for ages 23:49:13 release what? 23:49:22 the primer 23:49:29 i meant the RDF Core primer 23:49:34 you mean semanticWeb-long? 23:49:38 Oh... what's that? 23:49:41 Yes, i did 23:50:02 Jim Hendler is cleaning it up as his paper for this digital cities thing 23:50:04 so that should help 23:50:14 then i need to make sure my Mom can understand it 23:50:16 RDF Core primer? 23:50:49 It's a deliverable of the WG 23:50:59 ETA? 23:51:27 when the WG is done? 23:51:32 we hope to have a draft out soon 23:51:39 Primer should come out with the specs we do 23:51:43 well, who's working on it, etc.? 23:51:51 Check the list 23:51:53 we just started 23:52:04 ericm is heading things, i'm working on it as is a bunch of other people 23:52:12 RDF Primer, I'm guessing. How much orientation towards the SW aspect of things? 23:52:14 * AaronSw has to go soon... saturday approaches 23:52:18 Yep 23:52:21 I hope to have it cover most SW things. 23:52:31 I've sent a message to the list saying as much. 23:52:35 cool 23:52:37 But not sure it'll happen. 23:52:53 Ooooh, could you make that Python script send RDF Core junk to me? 23:53:41 Heh, I was wondering when you'd ask that. 23:53:45 :-) 23:54:02 I suppose I could, but it'd be more difficult since I'd have to tell it not to send it to me... 23:54:06 i'll 23:54:10 i'll do it on sunday 23:54:14 cheers 23:55:25 ok, gotta go 23:55:30 ta 23:55:33 O.K., have a nice Staurday 23:55:38 er... Saturday 23:55:40 c'ya! 23:55:43 bye 23:58:13 sbp has quit 23:58:18 sbp has joined #swhack